[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 18/44] mfd: twl4030-power: Register with kernel poweroff handler
On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Register with kernel poweroff handler instead of setting pm_power_off > directly. Register with a low priority value of 64 to reflect that > the original code only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set. > > Make twl4030_power_off static as it is only called from the twl4030-power > driver. > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > include/linux/i2c/twl.h | 1 - > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c > index 4d3ff37..bd6b830 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c > @@ -25,9 +25,10 @@ > */ > > #include <linux/module.h> > -#include <linux/pm.h> > +#include <linux/notifier.h> > #include <linux/i2c/twl.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/pm.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > > @@ -611,7 +612,8 @@ twl4030_power_configure_resources(const struct > twl4030_power_data *pdata) > * After a successful execution, TWL shuts down the power to the SoC > * and all peripherals connected to it. > */ > -void twl4030_power_off(void) > +static int twl4030_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long > unused1, > + void *unused2) > { > int err; > > @@ -619,8 +621,15 @@ void twl4030_power_off(void) > TWL4030_PM_MASTER_P1_SW_EVENTS); > if (err) > pr_err("TWL4030 Unable to power off\n"); > + > + return NOTIFY_DONE; > } > > +static struct notifier_block twl4030_poweroff_nb = { > + .notifier_call = twl4030_power_off, > + .priority = 64, 64 out of what? How is this calculated? Wouldn't it be better to define these? > +}; > + > static bool twl4030_power_use_poweroff(const struct twl4030_power_data > *pdata, > struct device_node *node) > { > @@ -836,7 +845,7 @@ static int twl4030_power_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) > } > > /* Board has to be wired properly to use this feature */ > - if (twl4030_power_use_poweroff(pdata, node) && !pm_power_off) { > + if (twl4030_power_use_poweroff(pdata, node)) { > /* Default for SEQ_OFFSYNC is set, lets ensure this */ > err = twl_i2c_read_u8(TWL_MODULE_PM_MASTER, &val, > TWL4030_PM_MASTER_CFG_P123_TRANSITION); > @@ -853,7 +862,13 @@ static int twl4030_power_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) > } > } > > - pm_power_off = twl4030_power_off; > + err = register_poweroff_handler(&twl4030_poweroff_nb); > + if (err) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "Failed to register poweroff handler\n"); If this is not fatal, you should issue a dev_warn() instead. > + /* Not a fatal error */ > + err = 0; How about using your own variable for this? Then you don't have to worry about resetting it. > + } > } > > relock: > @@ -869,6 +884,8 @@ relock: > > static int twl4030_power_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + unregister_poweroff_handler(&twl4030_poweroff_nb); Perhaps a naive question, but is there any way you can do this using devres (devm_* managed resources)? > return 0; > } > > diff --git a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h > index 8cfb50f..f8544f1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/i2c/twl.h > +++ b/include/linux/i2c/twl.h > @@ -680,7 +680,6 @@ struct twl4030_power_data { > }; > > extern int twl4030_remove_script(u8 flags); > -extern void twl4030_power_off(void); > > struct twl4030_codec_data { > unsigned int digimic_delay; /* in ms */ -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |