Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 12/44] mfd: ab8500-sysctrl: Register with kernel poweroff handler

[Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/09/2014 03:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:00:48AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 06 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ab8500-sysctrl.c
> > > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > +static int ab8500_power_off(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long unused1,
> > > > +                           void *unused2)
> > > >   {
> > > >         sigset_t old;
> > > >         sigset_t all;
> > > > @@ -34,11 +36,6 @@ static void ab8500_power_off(void)
> > > >         struct power_supply *psy;
> > > >         int ret;
> > > >
> > > > -       if (sysctrl_dev == NULL) {
> > > > -               pr_err("%s: sysctrl not initialized\n", __func__);
> > > > -               return;
> > > > -       }
> > > Can you explain the purpose of this change please?
> > I guess it's because the sysctrl_dev is already initialised when
> > registering the power_off handler, so there isn't a way to call the
> > above function with a NULL sysctrl_dev. Probably even with the original
> > code you didn't need this check (after some race fix in
> > ab8500_sysctrl_remove but races is one of the things Guenter's patches
> > try to address).
> Sounds reasonable, although I think this change should be part of
> another patch.
Sure, no problem. I'll split this into two patches.

Since we are at it, any idea what to do with the restart function
in the same file ? It is not used anywhere.

Guenter


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel