[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 for-xen-4.5 07/21] x86/VPMU: Handle APIC_LVTPC accesses
>>> On 03.10.14 at 23:40, <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > @@ -706,10 +693,6 @@ static int core2_vpmu_do_interrupt(struct cpu_user_regs > *regs) > return 0; > } > > - /* HW sets the MASK bit when performance counter interrupt occurs*/ > - vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc = apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED; > - apic_write_around(APIC_LVTPC, vpmu->hw_lapic_lvtpc); So why is simply deleting this correct? The comment makes pretty clear why it was being done here. All I could see being valid without further explanation is the removal of the middle of the three lines. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |