[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 04/27] arm/MSI: Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data
On 2014/10/21 1:21, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 04:06:52AM +0100, Yijing Wang wrote: >> Saving msi chip in pci_sys_data can make pci bus and >> devices don't need to know msi chip detail, it also >> make pci enumeration code be decoupled from msi chip. >> In fact, all pci devices under the same pci hostbridge >> share same msi chip. So msi chip should be seen as one >> of resources or attributes to be initialized in pci host >> bridge driver. Currently, pci hostbridge drivers create >> pci_host_bridge in pci_create_root_bus(), and pass arch >> specific pci sysdata to core pci scan functions. So pci >> arch sysdata is good place to save msi chip. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h | 6 ++++++ >> arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h | 9 +++++++++ >> arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 3 +++ >> drivers/pci/msi.c | 6 ++++++ >> include/linux/pci.h | 9 +++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h >> b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h >> index 7fc4278..59b0d87 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h >> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ struct hw_pci { >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS >> int domain; >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> + struct msi_chip *msi_chip; >> +#endif >> struct pci_ops *ops; >> int nr_controllers; >> void **private_data; >> @@ -47,6 +50,9 @@ struct pci_sys_data { >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS >> int domain; >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> + struct msi_chip *msi_chip; >> +#endif > > This struct is defined for ARM only. We are trying to remove dependency on it > so that we can have a single driver for ARM32 and ARM64 systems without > pcibios dependency. Why can't we add this msi chip data to the host > bridge struct instead ? I understand it is all a matter of how to pass > the pointer to pci_scan_root_bus(), where the bridge is created. > We could initialize the msi chip on the bridge through the bus pointer > returned by the pci_scan_root_bus() function. As mentioned in Patch 0, I will refactor generic pci hostbridge in another series, We need not only save msi_chip into pci_host_bridge, and other common info, like domain_nr, resources. Thanks! Yijing. > > Thanks, > Lorenzo > >> struct list_head node; >> int busnr; /* primary bus number >> */ >> u64 mem_offset; /* bus->cpu memory mapping offset >> */ >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h >> index 7e95d85..b562c09 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pci.h >> @@ -31,6 +31,15 @@ static inline int pci_proc_domain(struct pci_bus *bus) >> } >> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS */ >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> +static inline struct msi_chip *pci_msi_chip(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + struct pci_sys_data *root = bus->sysdata; >> + >> + return root->msi_chip; >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> /* >> * The PCI address space does equal the physical memory address space. >> * The networking and block device layers use this boolean for bounce >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c >> index 17a26c1..a19038d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c >> @@ -471,6 +471,9 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, >> struct hw_pci *hw, >> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS >> sys->domain = hw->domain; >> #endif >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> + sys->msi_chip = hw->msi_chip; >> +#endif >> sys->busnr = busnr; >> sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle; >> sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq; >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c >> index 22e413c..f11108c 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c >> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c >> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct >> msi_desc *desc) >> struct msi_chip *chip = dev->bus->msi; >> int err; >> >> + if (!chip) >> + chip = pci_msi_chip(dev->bus); >> + >> if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq) >> return -EINVAL; >> >> @@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq) >> struct msi_desc *entry = irq_get_msi_desc(irq); >> struct msi_chip *chip = entry->dev->bus->msi; >> >> + if (!chip) >> + chip = pci_msi_chip(entry->dev->bus); >> + >> if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq) >> return; >> >> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h >> index 9cd2721..7a48b40 100644 >> --- a/include/linux/pci.h >> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h >> @@ -1433,6 +1433,15 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { >> return -ENOSYS; } >> >> #include <asm/pci.h> >> >> +/* Just avoid compile error, will be clean up later */ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI >> + >> +#ifndef pci_msi_chip >> +#define pci_msi_chip(bus) NULL >> +#endif >> + >> +#endif >> + >> /* these helpers provide future and backwards compatibility >> * for accessing popular PCI BAR info */ >> #define pci_resource_start(dev, bar) ((dev)->resource[(bar)].start) >> -- >> 1.7.1 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >> > > > . > -- Thanks! Yijing _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |