Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 04/27] arm/MSI: Save MSI chip in pci_sys_data

[Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> index 22e413c..f11108c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c
>> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ int __weak arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct 
>> msi_desc *desc)
>>      struct msi_chip *chip = dev->bus->msi;
>>      int err;
>>  
>> +    if (!chip)
>> +            chip = pci_msi_chip(dev->bus);
>> +
>>      if (!chip || !chip->setup_irq)
>>              return -EINVAL;
>>  
>> @@ -50,6 +53,9 @@ void __weak arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq)
>>      struct msi_desc *entry = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
>>      struct msi_chip *chip = entry->dev->bus->msi;
>>  
>> +    if (!chip)
>> +            chip = pci_msi_chip(entry->dev->bus);
>> +
>>      if (!chip || !chip->teardown_irq)
>>              return;
>>  
>> diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
>> index 9cd2721..7a48b40 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/pci.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
>> @@ -1433,6 +1433,15 @@ static inline int pci_get_new_domain_nr(void) { 
>> return -ENOSYS; }
>>  
>>  #include <asm/pci.h>
>>  
>> +/* Just avoid compile error, will be clean up later */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> +
>> +#ifndef pci_msi_chip
>> +#define pci_msi_chip(bus)   NULL
>> +#endif
>> +#endif
> 
> I don't like the mixture of ARM changes and PCI core changes in the same
> patch.  Can you split this into a core patch that does something like this:
> 
>   struct msi_chip * __weak pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_bus *bus)
>   {
>     return NULL;
>   }
> 
>   struct msi_chip *pci_msi_controller(struct pci_bus *bus)
>   {
>     msi_chip *controller = bus->msi;
> 
>     if (controller)
>       return controller;
>     return pcibios_msi_controller(bus);
>   }
> 
> followed by an ARM patch that puts the msi_chip pointer in struct hw_pci
> and implements pcibios_msi_controller()?

OK, I will split it in half.

> 
> I know you're trying to *remove* weak functions, and this adds one, but
> this section of the series is more about getting rid of the ARM
> pcibios_add_bus() because all it was used for was setting the bus->msi
> pointer.

Yes, agree.

> 
> Eventually we might have a way to stash an MSI controller pointer in the
> generic pci_host_bridge struct, and then the pcibios_msi_controller()
> interface could go away.

Yep, I am doing the work to make a generic pci_host_bridge, and try to rip it 
out from
pci_create_root_bus, that's also a large changes across many archs.

> 
>> +
>>  /* these helpers provide future and backwards compatibility
>>   * for accessing popular PCI BAR info */
>>  #define pci_resource_start(dev, bar)        ((dev)->resource[(bar)].start)
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel