[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvm/load: Correct length checks for zeroextended records
On 24/10/14 16:42, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.10.14 at 12:50, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In the case that Xen is attempting to load a zeroextended HVM record where >> the >> difference needing extending would overflow the data blob, >> _hvm_check_entry() >> will incorrectly fail before working out that it would have been safe. >> >> The "len + sizeof(*d)" check is wrong. Consider zeroextending a 16 byte >> record into a 32 byte structure. "32 + hdr" will fail the overall context >> length check even though the pre-extended record in the stream is 16 bytes. >> >> The first condition is reduced to just a length check for hvm save header, >> while the second condition is extended to include a check that the record in >> the stream not exceeding the stream length. >> >> The error messages are extended to include further useful information. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > albeit with a comment: > >> --- a/xen/common/hvm/save.c >> +++ b/xen/common/hvm/save.c >> @@ -292,19 +292,22 @@ int _hvm_check_entry(struct hvm_domain_context *h, >> { >> struct hvm_save_descriptor *d >> = (struct hvm_save_descriptor *)&h->data[h->cur]; >> - if ( len + sizeof (*d) > h->size - h->cur) >> + if ( sizeof(*d) > h->size - h->cur) >> { >> printk(XENLOG_G_WARNING >> - "HVM restore: not enough data left to read %u bytes " >> - "for type %u\n", len, type); >> + "HVM restore: not enough data left to read %zu bytes " >> + "for type %u header\n", sizeof(*d), type); >> return -1; >> - } >> + } >> if ( (type != d->typecode) || (len < d->length) || >> - (strict_length && (len != d->length)) ) >> + (strict_length && (len != d->length)) || > If this is already being overhauled, I'd really like to at once switch to > > if ( (type != d->typecode) || > (strict_length ? (len != d->length) : (len < d->length)) || > > to make more obvious what is really being checked here. Definitely > no reason to re-submit though. Looks fine, if you are happy to fix this up on commit? ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |