[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH 09/16] MIPS/Xlr/MSI: Use MSI controller framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq
Use MSI controller framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/mips/pci/pci-xlr.c | 17 +++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci-xlr.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci-xlr.c index 0dde803..1e43c70 100644 --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci-xlr.c +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci-xlr.c @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ static struct resource nlm_pci_io_resource = { .flags = IORESOURCE_IO, }; +static struct msi_controller xlr_msi_ctrl; + struct pci_controller nlm_pci_controller = { .index = 0, .pci_ops = &nlm_pci_ops, @@ -156,6 +158,9 @@ struct pci_controller nlm_pci_controller = { .mem_offset = 0x00000000UL, .io_resource = &nlm_pci_io_resource, .io_offset = 0x00000000UL, +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI + .msi_ctrl = &xlr_msi_ctrl, +#endif }; /* @@ -214,11 +219,13 @@ static int get_irq_vector(const struct pci_dev *dev) } #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI -void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq) +static void xlr_teardown_msi_irq(struct msi_controller *ctrl, + unsigned int irq) { } -int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc) +static int xlr_setup_msi_irq(struct msi_controller *ctrl, + struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc) { struct msi_msg msg; struct pci_dev *lnk; @@ -263,6 +270,12 @@ int arch_setup_msi_irq(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msi_desc *desc) write_msi_msg(irq, &msg); return 0; } + +static struct msi_controller xlr_msi_ctrl = { + .setup_irq = xlr_setup_msi_irq, + .teardown_irq = xlr_teardown_msi_irq, +}; + #endif /* Extra ACK needed for XLR on chip PCI controller */ -- 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |