[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:03:07 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:03:18 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
> 
> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build
> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other
> files in arch/x86/xen.

Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes?  I don't really like
scope-creep in patch series.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
  - From: Juergen Gross

References:
- [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
  - From: Luis R. Rodriguez
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
  - From: David Vrabel
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
  - From: Luis R. Rodriguez
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
  - From: Juergen Gross

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] modify the IO_TLB_SEGSIZE and IO_TLB_DEFAULT_SIZE configurable as flexible requirement about SW-IOMMU.
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.