[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes
On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote:If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other files in arch/x86/xen.Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes? I don't really like scope-creep in patch series. Are you sure this is possible? XEN will be configured in more cases as today: this is the result of being able to build pv-drivers for hvm domains. BTW: it was you who wanted XEN_PVHVM to be implying XEN. So today the complete directory arch/x86/xen isn't built for non-pv kernels. Do you really want to change this? I don't think this is acceptable. Juergen _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |