Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

[David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/02/15 10:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>
>>> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build
>>> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other
>>> files in arch/x86/xen.
>>
>> Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes?  I don't really like
>> scope-creep in patch series.
> 
> Are you sure this is possible? XEN will be configured in more cases as
> today: this is the result of being able to build pv-drivers for hvm
> domains.

I mean there should be the minimum set of changes need for the Kconfig
refactor to work, but any additional improvements to the build etc.
should be via a different series.

David

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel