Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

["Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:55 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18/02/15 10:12, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build
>>>> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other
>>>> files in arch/x86/xen.
>>>
>>> Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes?  I don't really like
>>> scope-creep in patch series.
>>
>> Are you sure this is possible? XEN will be configured in more cases as
>> today: this is the result of being able to build pv-drivers for hvm
>> domains.
>
> I mean there should be the minimum set of changes need for the Kconfig
> refactor to work, but any additional improvements to the build etc.
> should be via a different series.

OK I can break down things into two series, one which deals with only
Kconfig stuff first, and if that goes well a second one which starts
to address some required code changes. Would that be a good step
forward? Feedback on the other threads would also be useful.

 Luis

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel