[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add feature flags to shared_info page
On 02/03/15 15:11, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 03/02/2015 02:56 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 02.03.15 at 14:44, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 02/03/15 13:15, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>>> On 02.03.15 at 13:59, <"jgross@xxxxxxxx".non-mime.internet> wrote: >>>>> In order to indicate the Xen tools capability to support the virtual >>>>> mapped linear p2m list instead the 3 level mfn tree add feature flags >>>>> to the shared_info page. >>>> But why in the shared info page? They'd belong to start info or should >>>> be obtainable via XENVER_get_features. >>> >>> Furthermore in this case, the virtual linear p2m is purely a >>> guest->toolstack feature/ABI. >>> >>> Xen deliberately has no knowledge of PV guest p2ms of either the 3level >>> or linear variety. >>> >>> Is there genuinely no better interface than the hypervisor feature >>> flags >>> to indicate a piece of toolstack support? >> >> As Ian indicated in his reply, much depends on whether any other >> mechanism would allow the information to be retrieved early enough >> in the guest. > > Options that would work are, regarding the time the information is > needed: > > - XENVER_get_features > - start info > - shared info > - any (other) hypercall > > All other interfaces are available much too late. > > I think start info is the best option, as it is built by the tools for > domUs and, as Jan already mentioned, would be a better place for the > information as shared info. I concur. The start info seems like the best place for it. > > The last remaining question: what to do regarding dom0? Here I see the > following alternatives: > > - do nothing: the 3 level mfn tree is built even if it is not needed, > wastes up to 2MB memory and might slow down dom0 (I doubt the slow > down would be detectable) > - set the flag based on a hypervisor boot parameter (not very nice) > - throw the 3 level mfn tree away during boot as soon as the tools can > tell dom0 to do so (requires a new interface) > > Any thoughts? The toolstack only needs to access the p2m when doing suspend/resume for migrate, or a coredump. None of these are applicable to dom0, so I think dom0 can get away with doing whatever it prefers in this regard. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |