[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Regression due to d9581c7dcac15c02ad4d47c60c60f4d8f197db55 en/fb: allow xenfb initialization for hvm guest
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 10:03:35AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > This has been in queue for some time. > > > > In our kernels (UEK3) we had to revert said patch. The patch says: > > > > " xen/fb: allow xenfb initialization for hvm guests > > > > There is no reasons why an HVM guest shouldn't be allowed to use xenfb. > > As a matter of fact ARM guests, HVM from Linux POV, can use xenfb. > > Given that no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for x86 HVM > > guests, they are not affected. > > > > Please note that at this time QEMU needs few outstanding fixes to > > provide xenfb on ARM: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=138739419700837&w=2 > > " > > > > which is a lie. The "no Xen toolstacks configure a xenfb backend for > > x86 HVM" is actually a lie. If you try to boot this kernel under > > Xen with Xend it will be a problem - as Xend does setup an 'vfb' > > device. > > > > The end result is that during the bootup - up until X starts, there is > > no console output on the VNC window. As the Linux kernel tries to use > > the vfb console driver. > > > > Any suggestsion on how to fix this? Should we just wrap the > > whole thing with #ifdef, like this? > > Is vfb properly setup by Xend? Does the console show on the vfb framebuffer? The vfb xenstore keys are. The VFB framebuffer (QEMU) is not - as it in most cases runs as qemu-traditional which would not set it up. > > If the vfb console works but is undesirable because the user expects the > output on the main vnc window (the vga framebuffer), then could we find > a way to prioritize the vga console over vfb on x86? This is all about Xend and QEMU traditional. Fixing the bug in Xend would be nice but I don't see anybody accepting the patch as those are kind of 'dead'. > > If the vfb console doesn't work, for example because the backend is not > running, then maybe we could find a way in Linux to avoid vfb if it is > not actually "connected". That sounds complicated. Especially during early bootup. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c > > b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c > > index 09dc447..584be8e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c > > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c > > @@ -696,7 +696,10 @@ static int __init xenfb_init(void) > > { > > if (!xen_domain()) > > return -ENODEV; > > - > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > + if (!xen_pv_domain()) > > + return -ENODEV; > > +#endif > > /* Nothing to do if running in dom0. */ > > if (xen_initial_domain()) > > return -ENODEV; > > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |