Re: [Xen-devel] One question to lowlevel/xl/xl.c and lowlevel/xc/xc.c

["Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2015/3/25 18:26, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-03-25 at 09:18 +0800, Chen, Tiejun wrote:
> > Actually my problem is that, I need to add a new parameter, 'flag', like
> > this, xc_assign_device(xxx,xxx,flag). So if I don't refine xc.c, tools
> > can't be compiled successfully. Or maybe you're suggesting I may isolate
> > this file while building tools, right?
> I answered this in my original reply:
>           it is acceptable for the new
>          parameter to not be plumbed up to the Python bindings until someone
>          comes along with a requirement to use it from Python. IOW you can just
>          pass whatever the nop value is for the new argument.
Yes, I knew this but I'm just getting a little confusion again after 
we're starting to talk if xc.c is compiled...
And I will try to do this.

> The "nop value" is whatever value should be passed to retain the current
> behaviour.
Sure.

Thanks
Tiejun


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel