[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 16/33] xen/arm: Let the toolstack configure the number of SPIs
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > @@ -68,16 +68,17 @@ static void vgic_init_pending_irq(struct pending_irq *p, > unsigned int virq) > p->irq = virq; > } > > -int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d) > +int domain_vgic_init(struct domain *d, unsigned int nr_spis) > { > int i; > > d->arch.vgic.ctlr = 0; > [...] > + /* Limit the number of SPIs supported base on the hardware */ > + if ( nr_spis > (gic_number_lines() - NR_LOCAL_IRQS) ) > + return -EINVAL; Is there anything in the h/w which leads to this restriction? If not then I think we should just check against the architectural 1020 limit and leave it at that. > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > index 9e0419e..6dacfef 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > @@ -125,6 +125,8 @@ struct arch_domain > unsigned int evtchn_irq; > } __cacheline_aligned; > > +#define domain_is_configured(d) ((d)->arch.is_configured) > + > struct arch_vcpu > { > struct { > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h > index ba5a67d..254cc17 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ void copy_from_paddr(void *dst, paddr_t paddr, unsigned > long len); > void arch_get_xen_caps(xen_capabilities_info_t *info); > > int construct_dom0(struct domain *d); > +int configure_dom0(struct domain *d); Are these two hunks stray from some other patch in the series? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |