[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] xen/iommu: arm: Use p2m_ipa_bits as stage2 input size
Hi Ian, On 05/05/15 14:24, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:40 +1000, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: >> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The Stage2 input-size must match what the CPU uses because >> the SMMU and the CPU share page-tables. >> >> Test that the SMMU supports the P2M IPA bit size, use it if >> supported or bail out if not. >> >> Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 10 ++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c >> b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c >> index 8a9b58b..d9f3931 100644 >> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c >> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c >> @@ -2230,8 +2230,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct >> arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> size = arm_smmu_id_size_to_bits((id >> ID2_IAS_SHIFT) & ID2_IAS_MASK); >> smmu->s1_output_size = min_t(unsigned long, PHYS_MASK_SHIFT, size); >> >> - /* Xen: Stage-2 input size is not restricted */ >> - smmu->s2_input_size = size; >> + /* Xen: Stage-2 input size has to match p2m_ipa_bits. */ >> + if (size < p2m_ipa_bits) { > > Referencing my question on 0/3, what if size > p2m_ipa_bits? The would require more work because we would need to restrict the P2M which would cause other trouble (see my answer on 0/3) such as the 1:1 mapping in dom0. > Do we need to also check that we are configuring the same number of > levels of PT etc, or is that already handled? The SMMU only care about the number of IPA bits. Regards, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |