[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH Remus v1 1/8] tools/libxc: adjust the memory allocation for migration
On 05/07/2015 05:48 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 07/05/15 07:37, Yang Hongyang wrote:Move the memory allocation before the concrete live/nolive save in order to avoid the free/alloc memory loop when using Remus. Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c index 5d9c267..7fed668 100644 --- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ #include "xc_sr_common.h" +DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(unsigned long, to_send);This unfortunately causes an issue when concurrent calls to xc_domain_save() in the same process. While this is a highly ill-advised action, I did try to avoid breaking it. Please move this declaration into the ctx.save union. I know the best way is to put this into ctx.save union, but I haven't found a method to put it in, the DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER macro can not be used there, should I just define a unsigned long var at ctx.save union, and use other macro(what macro?) define at save()? + /* * Writes an Image header and Domain header into the stream. */ @@ -475,25 +477,11 @@ static int update_progress_string(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, static int send_domain_memory_live(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) { xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; - DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(unsigned long, to_send); xc_shadow_op_stats_t stats = { 0, ctx->save.p2m_size }; char *progress_str = NULL; unsigned x; int rc = -1; - to_send = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc_pages( - xch, to_send, NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); - - ctx->save.batch_pfns = malloc(MAX_BATCH_SIZE * - sizeof(*ctx->save.batch_pfns)); - ctx->save.deferred_pages = calloc(1, bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)); - - if ( !ctx->save.batch_pfns || !to_send || !ctx->save.deferred_pages ) - { - ERROR("Unable to allocate memory for to_{send,fix}/batch bitmaps"); - goto out; - } - rc = enable_logdirty(ctx); if ( rc ) goto out; @@ -593,10 +581,6 @@ static int send_domain_memory_live(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) out: xc_set_progress_prefix(xch, NULL); free(progress_str); - xc_hypercall_buffer_free_pages(xch, to_send, - NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); - free(ctx->save.deferred_pages); - free(ctx->save.batch_pfns); return rc; } @@ -609,17 +593,6 @@ static int send_domain_memory_nonlive(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; int rc = -1; - ctx->save.batch_pfns = malloc(MAX_BATCH_SIZE * - sizeof(*ctx->save.batch_pfns)); - ctx->save.deferred_pages = calloc(1, bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)); - - if ( !ctx->save.batch_pfns || !ctx->save.deferred_pages ) - { - PERROR("Failed to allocate memory for nonlive tracking structures"); - errno = ENOMEM; - goto err; - } - rc = suspend_domain(ctx); if ( rc ) goto err; @@ -631,9 +604,6 @@ static int send_domain_memory_nonlive(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) goto err; err: - free(ctx->save.deferred_pages); - free(ctx->save.batch_pfns); - return rc; } @@ -645,6 +615,20 @@ static int save(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, uint16_t guest_type) xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; int rc, saved_rc = 0, saved_errno = 0; + to_send = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc_pages( + xch, to_send, NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)));This allocation only needs to be made if ctx->save.live is set. For plain suspend and resume, logdirty handling is not required.+ ctx->save.batch_pfns = malloc(MAX_BATCH_SIZE * + sizeof(*ctx->save.batch_pfns)); + ctx->save.deferred_pages = calloc(1, bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)); + + if ( !ctx->save.batch_pfns || !to_send || !ctx->save.deferred_pages ) + { + ERROR("Unable to allocate memory for to_{send,fix}/batch bitmaps"); + rc = -1; + errno = ENOMEM; + goto err; + } +Instead of complicating save() like this, could you introduce two new static functions setup() and cleanup() which subsume the ctx->save.ops.{setup,cleanup}() calls and also do these allocations and free. Sure, will do this in next version. I think the SHADOW_OP_OFF hypercall can also be moved into the cleanup() function. ~AndrewIPRINTF("Saving domain %d, type %s", ctx->domid, dhdr_type_to_str(guest_type)); @@ -704,6 +688,11 @@ static int save(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, uint16_t guest_type) if ( rc ) PERROR("Failed to clean up"); + xc_hypercall_buffer_free_pages(xch, to_send, + NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); + free(ctx->save.deferred_pages); + free(ctx->save.batch_pfns); + if ( saved_rc ) { rc = saved_rc;. -- Thanks, Yang. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |