[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 09/14] libxc/save: adjust the memory allocation for migration
On 05/12/2015 08:14 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 12/05/15 12:25, Yang Hongyang wrote:Move the memory allocation before the concrete live/nolive save in order to avoid the free/alloc memory loop when using Remus. Signed-off-by: Yang Hongyang <yanghy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> --- tools/libxc/xc_sr_common.h | 1 + tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_common.h b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_common.h index c0f90d4..276d00a 100644 --- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_common.h +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_common.h @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ struct xc_sr_context unsigned nr_batch_pfns; unsigned long *deferred_pages; unsigned long nr_deferred_pages; + xc_hypercall_buffer_t dirty_bitmap_hbuf; } save; struct /* Restore data. */ diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c index 368aacb..0953c35 100644 --- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c @@ -475,24 +475,12 @@ static int update_progress_string(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, static int send_domain_memory_live(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) { xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; - DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER(unsigned long, dirty_bitmap); xc_shadow_op_stats_t stats = { 0, ctx->save.p2m_size }; char *progress_str = NULL; unsigned x; int rc = -1; - - dirty_bitmap = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc_pages( - xch, dirty_bitmap, NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); - - ctx->save.batch_pfns = malloc(MAX_BATCH_SIZE * - sizeof(*ctx->save.batch_pfns)); - ctx->save.deferred_pages = calloc(1, bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)); - - if ( !ctx->save.batch_pfns || !dirty_bitmap || !ctx->save.deferred_pages ) - { - ERROR("Unable to allocate memory for to_{send,fix}/batch bitmaps"); - goto out; - } + DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_SHADOW(unsigned long, dirty_bitmap, + (&ctx->save.dirty_bitmap_hbuf));You can drop this extra bracketing now that DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_SHADOW() has been fixed. Ok, will drop the bracketing in all DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_SHADOW() calls rc = enable_logdirty(ctx); if ( rc ) @@ -593,10 +581,6 @@ static int send_domain_memory_live(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) out: xc_set_progress_prefix(xch, NULL); free(progress_str); - xc_hypercall_buffer_free_pages(xch, dirty_bitmap, - NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); - free(ctx->save.deferred_pages); - free(ctx->save.batch_pfns); return rc; } @@ -609,17 +593,6 @@ static int send_domain_memory_nonlive(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; int rc = -1; - ctx->save.batch_pfns = malloc(MAX_BATCH_SIZE * - sizeof(*ctx->save.batch_pfns)); - ctx->save.deferred_pages = calloc(1, bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)); - - if ( !ctx->save.batch_pfns || !ctx->save.deferred_pages ) - { - PERROR("Failed to allocate memory for nonlive tracking structures"); - errno = ENOMEM; - goto err; - } - rc = suspend_domain(ctx); if ( rc ) goto err; @@ -631,15 +604,30 @@ static int send_domain_memory_nonlive(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) goto err; err: - free(ctx->save.deferred_pages); - free(ctx->save.batch_pfns); - return rc; } static int setup(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) { + xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; int rc; + DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_SHADOW(unsigned long, dirty_bitmap, + (&ctx->save.dirty_bitmap_hbuf)); + + dirty_bitmap = xc_hypercall_buffer_alloc_pages( + xch, dirty_bitmap, NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); + ctx->save.batch_pfns = malloc(MAX_BATCH_SIZE * + sizeof(*ctx->save.batch_pfns)); + ctx->save.deferred_pages = calloc(1, bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size)); + + if ( !ctx->save.batch_pfns || !dirty_bitmap || !ctx->save.deferred_pages ) + { + ERROR("Unable to allocate memory for dirty bitmaps, batch pfns and" + " deferred pages"); + rc = -1; + errno = ENOMEM; + goto err; + } rc = ctx->save.ops.setup(ctx); if ( rc ) @@ -655,12 +643,21 @@ static int setup(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) static void cleanup(struct xc_sr_context *ctx) { xc_interface *xch = ctx->xch; + DECLARE_HYPERCALL_BUFFER_SHADOW(unsigned long, dirty_bitmap, + (&ctx->save.dirty_bitmap_hbuf));And also drop this bracketing.+ xc_shadow_control(xch, ctx->domid, XEN_DOMCTL_SHADOW_OP_OFF, NULL, 0, NULL, 0, NULL); if ( ctx->save.ops.cleanup(ctx) ) PERROR("Failed to clean up"); + + xc_hypercall_buffer_free_pages(xch, dirty_bitmap, + NRPAGES(bitmap_size(ctx->save.p2m_size))); + free(ctx->save.deferred_pages); + free(ctx->save.batch_pfns); +Stray blank line. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>} /*. -- Thanks, Yang. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |