Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 1/2] xen/pvh: use a custom IO bitmap for PVH hardware domains

[Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

El 13/05/15 a les 11.53, Jan Beulich ha escrit:
>>>> On 11.05.15 at 16:57, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>> @@ -1446,6 +1446,9 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p)
>>  
>>      dmi_end_boot();
>>  
>> +    if ( is_hardware_domain(dom0) )
>> +        setup_io_bitmap(dom0);
> 
> Is it indeed possible for is_hardware_domain() to be false for dom0
> at this point?

No, I will remove this check in the next version.

>> --- a/xen/common/domain.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/domain.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>  #include <xsm/xsm.h>
>>  #include <xen/trace.h>
>>  #include <xen/tmem.h>
>> +#include <asm/setup.h>
>>  
>>  /* Linux config option: propageted to domain0 */
>>  /* xen_processor_pmbits: xen control Cx, Px, ... */
>> @@ -219,6 +220,7 @@ static int late_hwdom_init(struct domain *d)
>>      rangeset_swap(d->iomem_caps, dom0->iomem_caps);
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
>>      rangeset_swap(d->arch.ioport_caps, dom0->arch.ioport_caps);
>> +    setup_io_bitmap(d);
>>  #endif
> 
> Considering that rangesets are getting swapped rather than
> copied, I think you also need to reset Dom0's I/O bitmap here
> to the ordinary, non-hardware domain one.

Yes. Would it be fine to memset it and just call setup_io_bitmap on it
again, or would you prefer to exchange it with the static one and free it?

Roger.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel