[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only

To: "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Parth Dixit" <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 17:31:10 +0100
Cc: keir@xxxxxxx, ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, tim@xxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:31:19 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

>>> On 20.05.15 at 17:49, <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What about defining a new define HAVE_NUMA?

That might be an acceptable compromise.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 00/41] Add ACPI support for arm64 on Xen
  - From: Parth Dixit
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only
  - From: Parth Dixit
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only
  - From: Julien Grall
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only
  - From: Julien Grall

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 38/41] arm : acpi enable efi for acpi
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] xen/vm_event: Clean up control-register-write vm_events
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/41] arm/acpi: Build numa for x86 only
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/41] arm/acpi: Build pmstat for x86 only
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.