Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main recipe of nested test job

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Pang, LongtaoX writes ("RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH v11 6/7] Compose the main 
recipe of nested test job"):
> So, may I implement these action via below recipe in sg-run-job? Since, this 
> would be less code to 
> be changed and we want to avoid to involve tcl plumbing in sg-run-job. Also, 
> I think there is no harmful.

I don't object to that approach.

But it isn't as simple as you suggest, unfortunately.  Because:

> proc need-hosts/test-nested {} {return host}
> proc run-job/test-nested {} {
>     run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install + host l1
>     run-ts . = ts-nested-setup + host l1
>     run-ts . = ts-xen-install l1
>     run-ts . = ts-host-reboot l1
>     run-ts . = ts-leak-check basis l1
>     run-ts . = ts-debian-hvm-install l1 l2
>     run-ts . = ts-guest-stop l1 l2
>     run-ts . = ts-leak-check check l1
>     run-ts . = ts-logs-capture l1
>     run-ts . = ts-guest-destroy + host l1

This will not run ts-logs-capture on l1, unless all the previous tests
passed.  That's obviously not what we want.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel