[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 3/3] x86/monitor: don't use hvm_funcs directly

On 07/09/2015 03:52 PM, Lengyel, Tamas wrote:
>     I don't feel very strongly about it, so if you really prefer you can
>     keep the code as it is, however this looks somewhat counterintuitive to
>     me, especially when you compare the new condition to the old one,
>     because
>     ...
> Yea, this patch is not critical. Jan just requested to use a wrapper for
> hvm_funcs in the other patch so I figured I might as well fix it
> everywhere in our code. It's pretty minor stuff.

Well, I think that the patch is a good idea, I was just talking about
changing the function to return a bool_t. Sorry for not being clearer.


Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.