|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 for Xen 4.6 2/4] libxc: enable per-VCPU parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
On Fri, 2015-07-10 at 23:52 -0500, Chong Li wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
> index d1d2ab3..58f1a7a 100644
> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
> @@ -915,6 +915,15 @@ int xc_sched_rtds_domain_get(xc_interface *xch,
> uint32_t domid,
> struct xen_domctl_sched_rtds *sdom);
>
So, here in the header, you're not changing the prototype of
xc_sched_rtds_domain_{get,set} to use the typedef.
However...
> +int xc_sched_rtds_vcpu_set(xc_interface *xch,
> + uint32_t domid,
> + xen_domctl_schedparam_vcpu_t *vcpus,
> + uint16_t num_vcpus);
>
... you hare using the typedef for the newly introduced functions
xc_sched_rtds_vcpu_{get,set}(), and...
> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_rt.c
> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_rt.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
> int xc_sched_rtds_domain_set(xc_interface *xch,
> uint32_t domid,
> - struct xen_domctl_sched_rtds *sdom)
> + xen_domctl_sched_rtds_t *sdom)
>
...you are actually changing the _implementation_ of
xc_sched_rtds_domain_{get,set}().
That's all rather inconsistent.
Regards,
Dario
--
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |