[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] build: update top-level make help
On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 15:31 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 09:22 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > > On 9/2/15 9:14 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > On 02.09.15 at 15:34, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 07:14 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > > > > On 02.09.15 at 15:09, <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> 09/01/15 10:10 PM > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > --- a/Makefile > > > > > > > > +++ b/Makefile > > > > > > > > @@ -228,16 +228,23 @@ help: > > > > > > > > @echo ' install-stubdom - build and install the > > > > > > > > stubdomain > > > > > > > > images' > > > > > > > > @echo ' install-docs - build and install user > > > > > > > > documentation' > > > > > > > > @echo '' > > > > > > > > - @echo 'Building targets:' > > > > > > > > + @echo 'Local dist targets:' > > > > > > > > @echo ' dist - build and install > > > > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > into > > > > > > > > local dist directory' > > > > > > > > @echo ' world - clean everything then make > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dist' > > > > > > > > - @echo ' xen - build and install > > > > > > > > Xen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hypervisor' > > > > > > > > - @echo ' tools - build and install > > > > > > > > tools' > > > > > > > > - @echo ' stubdom - build and install > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stubdomain images' > > > > > > > > - @echo ' docs - build and install > > > > > > > > user > > > > > > > > documentation' > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why are these being removed? At least the xen and tools ones > > > > > > > work > > > > > > > fine for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the makefile they're marked as "legacy" and they are wired > > > > > > straight > > > > > > to their "dist-" equivalents. > > > > > > > > > > But still they're there and they work (and they're faster to type > > > > > > > > > > than > > > > > their "dist-" equivalents). > > > > > > > > If they are legacy then it is correct to not list them here. > > > > > > Hmm - why does "legacy" imply "not documented here"? > > > > > > But anyway - I don't mean to stand in the way of you committing the > > > patch as is, as long as those (legacy) build targets don't go away. > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > I definitely had no intention of removing them. I was merely trying to > > update the help output to match what I saw when reading the contents of > > the Makefile. > > > > Do I still need to resubmit or is my S-o-b on the ML ok? > > A post-facto S-o-b like you did is fine. And now I've applied. > > Ian. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |