Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] efi/libstub/fdt: Standardize the names of EFI stub parameters

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 11:43 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> Xen will not boot the kernel via the stub, but directly. It needs to
> supply a EFI like environment so that the kernel can boot via ACPI.
> There is no reason whatsoever to mock up boot services or other pieces
> of UEFI functionality that are not needed.

I'm correct that on native the EFI stub calls ExitBootServices, right?

So the flow for native is:

EFI -> Linux EFI Stub -> Exit Boot Services -> Non-EFI Linux head.S entrypoint

For Xen it is more like:

Xen domain builder -------  ...    ... ------> Non-EFI Linux head.S entrypoint

>  The core kernel does not call any boot services

And it cannot because ExitBootServices has already been called.

I think given all that there should no reason at all for Xen to be
providing boot services.

>  or SetVirtualAddressMap/ConvertPointer, and

These two are RTS, so in principal it could.

(I'm not sure about ConvertPointer, is it useful for OS kernels, or just
for "UEFI components" mentioned at http://wiki.phoenix.com/wiki/index.php/E
FI_RUNTIME_SERVICES#ConvertPointer.28.29 ?)

> there is already paravirtualized plumbing in place for the remaining
> runtime services.
> 
> Hence my claim earlier that we should cope with the runtime services
> pointer being NULL, since that is really the only thing standing in
> the way from the kernel side. If you feel that violates the spec in
> some way, we could at least conditionalise it on EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES
> having been set already, this gives the Xen code a chance of
> overriding them.
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel