[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/9] x86/intel_pstate: add a booting param to select the driver to load
On 23/10/2015 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 23.10.15 at 10:18, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 07/10/2015 23:46, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 14.09.15 at 04:32, <wei.w.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > >> > @@ -647,9 +648,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_driver_init(void) > >> > int ret = 0; > >> > > >> > if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) && > >> > - (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)) > >> > - ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver); > >> > - else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) && > >> > + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)) { > >> > + ret = intel_pstate_init(); > >> > + if (ret) > >> > + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver); > >> > + } else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) && > >> > (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)) > >> > ret = powernow_register_driver(); > >> > >> Since you're basically modifying the entire body of the function, > >> please > > gets its > >> coding style corrected as you fiddle with it. > > > > Ok, I guess you was probably referring to the remaining lines in the > > function - "(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD))".. Will > > align them as well. > > No, I'm not just talking about alignment. And the coding style of the file is > mixed > already (see e.g. the following function, which admittedly has even more > blanks > than needed), so getting this function into proper shape since you modify it > in its > entirety is a step in the right direction. > Ok. I will use Xen style brackets for this function. Best, Wei _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |