[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/P2M: consolidate handling of types not requiring a valid MFN

>>> On 09.11.15 at 16:02, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/11/15 14:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> As noted regarding the mixture of checks in p2m_pt_set_entry(),
>> introduce an new P2M type group allowing to be used everywhere we
> "a new P2M"
>> just care about accepting operations with either a valid MFN or a type
>> permitting to be used without (valid) MFN.
>> Note that p2m_mmio_dm is not included in P2M_NO_MFN_TYPES, as for the
>> intended purpose that one ought to be treated similar to p2m_invalid
>> (perhaps the two should ultimately get folded anyway).
> I seem to recall that p2m_invalid is still required to make the default
> ioreq server infrastructure work with older qemu's
> We really should see about cleaning the two up however.
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> You probably also want to note that PoD superpages are now INVALID_MFN
> rather than _mfn(0), but code wise,

Added a sentence.

> Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>



Xen-devel mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.