[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.6-testing test] 65112: regressions - FAIL
>>> On 27.11.15 at 13:28, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 12:02 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: >> As explained below, in 65112 this step did not run because the earlier >> step `guest-localmigrate' failed: >> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65112/test-amd64- >> amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm/info.html > > Would it be possible to arrange for "blocked" to appear somewhere in the > results for the job? e.g. "blocked fail in XXX REGR. vs. YYY". README.email > says "The results normally start with the result in this flight" and I > think this would be in keeping with that. > > Otherwise I think people naturally tend to just read the "and are blocking" > section and forget to consider that non-blocking stuff further down may > have (tolerably) failed but then blocking something else which is then > blocking the push. Indeed - that's precisely how I've looked at things this morning. >> --- a/README.email >> +++ b/README.email >> @@ -71,6 +71,24 @@ history. Here are some examples: >> detect regressions of this test. Perhaps the test has been >> recently introduced. >> >> + fail in 58948 REGR. vs. 63449 It seems confusing to me that the numbers are reversed from how I think they would normally appear (regressions normally being against older flights). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |