Re: [Xen-devel] Which trees are supported (Was: Re: [qemu-upstream-4.2-testing test] 77180: regressions - FAIL)

[Lars Kurth <lars.kurth.xen@xxxxxxxxx>]

> On 7 Jan 2016, at 11:45, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>> On 07.01.16 at 12:22, <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So this arose because Stefano was unaware that 4.2 was no longer supported.
>> Neither am I ever confident about where the cut-off lie, e.g. I always have
>> to ask if I am doing backports for a security issue.
>> 
>> We should add rows to http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Release_Features right
>> under Initial Release giving first the date until which that tree is
>> supported with backports and second the date until which security support
>> will exist. We might also want to add a third "status" row. e.g.
>> "Supported", "Security Support only", "EOL" (we'll deal with extended
>> support by a third party when that next arises).
>> 
>> I'm happy to make the edits, however I don't know what dates I would write 
>> here. Taking it to be 18 months of Support and a further 18 months of
>> security support I would get:

Ian, that would be great. Can you ping me when done?
I still have an open action to come up with an approach to include information 
in this table in in-tree documentation
Lars



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel