Re: [Xen-devel] OSSTEST: Re-blessing cubietruck-{picasso, gleizes, metzinger} for production use

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("OSSTEST: Re-blessing 
cubietruck-{picasso,gleizes,metzinger} for production use"):
> I've been running a couple of adhoc production tests per day on these since
> before Xmas and they haven't lost sight of their disks again.
> 
> TLDR; I think we should throw them back in the pool.

Great.

> With the recent timeout fixes they are working as well as the production
> cubietruck-braque.
> 
> There are two flakey tests test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds and test-armhf-armhf-
> libvirt-raw, but those appear to be much better than before the timeout
> changes and not specific to these three boards since the fourth one looks
> to behave much the same.
> 
> At first glance it looks like some later test steps might just need a bit
> more time on CT too.

Maybe we should have target_adjust_timeout honour a host property to
multiply timeouts by some factor.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel