[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pre Sandy bridge IOMMU support (gm45)
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 12:59:00AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.01.16 at 02:47, <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 04:37:05AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> (re-adding xen-devel) > >> > >> >>> On 26.01.16 at 12:28, <thierry.laurion@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Iommu=0 let the whole Qubes system work, without enforcing hardware > >> > compartimentalisation (iommu is enforced in software mode) > >> > > >> > When iommu=no-igfx is enforced, shell console boot up works flawlessly. > >> > All > >> > domu machines get booted up. A system hang will happen at the moment a > >> > domu > >> > machine does graphic rendering, > >> > >> And this is (other than I originally implied) without passing through > >> the IGD to the DomU? If so, I can't see the difference between a > >> guest rendering to its display (and vncviewer or whatever frontend > >> you use converting this to rendering on the host) and rendering > >> which originates in the host. > > > > Not sure if relevant, but window content is mapped from PV domU directly > > into X server (in dom0) address space, using xc_map_foreign_pages. It is > > done by hacking XShmAttach function. Not sure what graphics driver do > > with it next. Theoretically it could be possible that driver will direct IGD > > to do DMA directly from that place, but I guess it does not. > > Interesting. This then really needs to be investigated from the > Qubes end rather than here. Possible resulting patches, if > relevant outside of that unusual setup, would then of course be > appreciated to be sent here. Note that Thierry said "The point is the iommu=no-igfx doesn't fix the issue", so either it is totally unrelated issue, or iommu=no-igfx is broken. Does iommu=no-igfx have any meaning when IDG is _not_ passed through to some domU? And generally - is IOMMU used in any way for dom0 devices? Is Linux kernel able to utilize it for its own purposes (my guess: no)? Somehow unrelated: I've tried to get p2m iommu mapping using `xl debug-key o`, but it's too long (and xenconsoled isn't fast enough to catch it into hypervisor.log). Is is possible to enlarge console ring buffer at runtime? If not, is `conring_size` the right option? How large it should be (aprox) for `xl debug-key o` output? -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-GÃrecki Invisible Things Lab A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |