[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 4/9] vring: Introduce vring_use_dma_api()
This is a kludge, but no one has come up with a a better idea yet. We'll introduce DMA API support guarded by vring_use_dma_api(). Eventually we may be able to return true on more and more systems, and hopefully we can get rid of vring_use_dma_api() entirely some day. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index e12e385f7ac3..b78aeeb3f6be 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c @@ -104,6 +104,30 @@ struct vring_virtqueue { #define to_vvq(_vq) container_of(_vq, struct vring_virtqueue, vq) +/* + * The interaction between virtio and a possible IOMMU is a mess. + * + * On most systems with virtio, physical addresses match bus addresses, + * and it doesn't particularly matter whether we use the DMA API. + * + * On some systems, including Xen and any system with a physical device + * that speaks virtio behind a physical IOMMU, we must use the DMA API + * for virtio DMA to work at all. + * + * On other systems, including SPARC and PPC64, virtio-pci devices are + * enumerated as though they are behind an IOMMU, but the virtio host + * ignores the IOMMU, so we must either pretend that the IOMMU isn't + * there or somehow map everything as the identity. + * + * For the time being, we preserve historic behavior and bypass the DMA + * API. + */ + +static bool vring_use_dma_api(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) +{ + return false; +} + static struct vring_desc *alloc_indirect(struct virtqueue *_vq, unsigned int total_sg, gfp_t gfp) { -- 2.5.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |