Re: [Xen-devel] Clarifying PVH mode requirements

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 02/01/2016 06:49 PM, Brendan Gregg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Boris Ostrovsky 
> <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Current PVH implementation has never been described as
>     production-ready. What is happening now with HVMlite is
>     essentially bringing PVH to production-quality level.
>
>
> So should I s/PVH/HVMlite/g?
From user perspective that will be almost true. I am not sure it should 
be classified as PV mode anymore since it's really an HVM guest without 
any devices. But it's not there yet so it's too early to point your 
editor there.
BTW, I don't think the flowchart in the wiki is correct as far as PVH is 
concerned --- you can't use PVH unless HVM (and, in fact, PVHVM) is 
supported.

-boris


> Or too much of a simlification? thanks,



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel