[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] HVMlite ABI specification DRAFT A
>>> On 05.02.16 at 12:04, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/02/16 10:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 05.02.16 at 10:50, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Status flag? Why don't we just say that all user-settable bits in the >>> status register will be set to 0 (or cleared)? >> Would be an option too. > > What about the ID bit, which probably ought to be set? Why that? This flag exists solely to indicate presence of CPUID, and does so by being modifiable (not by being set). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |