[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/13] xen/xsplice: Hypervisor implementation of XEN_XSPLICE_op (v7)
> > +# Enable/Disable xsplice support > > +config XSPLICE > > + bool "xsplice support" > > + default y > > + depends on HAS_XSPLICE > > + ---help--- > > + Allows a running Xen hypervisor to be patched without rebooting. > > + This is primarily used to patch an hypervisor with XSA fixes. > > + > > + If unsure, say Y. > > + > > endmenu > > I'm indifferent on the HAS_XSPLICE, you can drop that if you want to > simply stuff. OK, let me remove it. Thanks! .. snip.. > > +#ifdef CONFIG_XSPLICE > > + case XEN_SYSCTL_xsplice_op: > > + ret = xsplice_control(&op->u.xsplice); > > + copyback = 1; > > + break; > > +#endif > > Should the case statement still exist and not just return -ENOSYS? > Otherwise we're needlessly going into arch_do_sysctl() just to get the > same result. There is some other code in that function, such as: 398 399 #ifdef TEST_COVERAGE 400 case XEN_SYSCTL_coverage_op: 401 ret = sysctl_coverage_op(&op->u.coverage_op); 402 break; 403 #endif Which follows that pattern. I figured I would the same thing as the rest of the code around it. It is not that neat .. But I could also make this a bit neater and have the header file return -ENOSYS, like this: diff --git a/xen/common/sysctl.c b/xen/common/sysctl.c index b81b8cd..a8355c5 100644 --- a/xen/common/sysctl.c +++ b/xen/common/sysctl.c @@ -461,12 +461,11 @@ long do_sysctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_sysctl_t) u_sysctl) ret = tmem_control(&op->u.tmem_op); break; -#ifdef CONFIG_XSPLICE case XEN_SYSCTL_xsplice_op: ret = xsplice_control(&op->u.xsplice); - copyback = 1; + if ( ret != -ENOSYS ) + copyback = 1; break; -#endif default: ret = arch_do_sysctl(op, u_sysctl); diff --git a/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h b/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h index 3c1b2e4..a0ae95e 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/xsplice.h @@ -23,15 +23,18 @@ struct xsplice_patch_func { uint8_t pad[24]; }; -int xsplice_control(struct xen_sysctl_xsplice_op *); - #ifdef CONFIG_XSPLICE +int xsplice_control(struct xen_sysctl_xsplice_op *); void do_xsplice(void); struct bug_frame *xsplice_find_bug(const char *eip, int *id); bool_t is_module(const void *addr); bool_t is_active_module_text(unsigned long addr); unsigned long search_module_extables(unsigned long addr); #else +static inline xsplice_control(struct xen_sysctl_xsplice_op *) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} static inline void do_xsplice(void) { }; static inline struct bug_frame *xsplice_find_bug(const char *eip, int *id) { Yeah, let me roll that in. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |