[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 8/8] x86/efi: Generate uefi_call_wrapper() when compiling with clang
On 10/02/16 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 09.02.16 at 21:01, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> >> >> What is the GCC version check supposed to be achieving here? GCC has >> supported this syntax since 3.0 > This is best answered by looking at where we've got these headers > from - the gnu-efi package. It has ... > >> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/efibind.h >> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/x86_64/efibind.h >> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ typedef uint64_t UINTN; >> #endif >> #endif >> >> -#if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4) >> +#if __GNUC__ > 4 || (__GNUC__ == 4 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4) || __clang__ >> #define uefi_call_wrapper(func, va_num, ...) func(__VA_ARGS__) >> #else >> /* for x86_64, EFI_FUNCTION_WRAPPER must be defined */ > /* for x86_64, EFI_FUNCTION_WRAPPER must be defined */ > #if defined(HAVE_USE_MS_ABI) > #define uefi_call_wrapper(func, va_num, ...) func(__VA_ARGS__) > #else > UINTN uefi_call_wrapper(void *func, unsigned long va_num, ...); > #endif > #define EFI_FUNCTION __attribute__((ms_abi)) > > I think this makes clear that the needed feature here is the > attribute, which certainly wasn't available in older gcc. > > With that the question is whether the Clang case won't also need > a version check, since I can't imagine them having supported this > prior to gcc introducing it. Clang has an substantially more sane way than GCC of checking for individual features. I will introduce and use the __has_{attribute,feature}() infrastructure to tests like this. Experimentally, Clang 3.5 does have ms_abi support ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |