[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: probe for existence of qemu-xen trace backends.
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 14:27 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 14:18 +0000, Anthony PERARD wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 02:14:13PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > diff --git a/tools/Makefile b/tools/Makefile > > > > index 5688a7c..76a2235 100644 > > > > --- a/tools/Makefile > > > > +++ b/tools/Makefile > > > > @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ qemu-xen-dir-force-update: qemu-xen-dir-find > > > > Â fi > > > > Â > > > > Âifeq ($(debug),y) > > > > -QEMU_XEN_ENABLE_DEBUG := --enable-debug --enable-trace- > > > > backend=stderr > > > > +QEMU_XEN_ENABLE_DEBUG := --enable-debug > > > > Âelse > > > > ÂQEMU_XEN_ENABLE_DEBUG := > > > > Âendif > > > > @@ -240,8 +240,16 @@ subdir-all-qemu-xen-dir: qemu-xen-dir-find > > > > Â source=.; \ > > > > Â fi; \ > > > > Â cd qemu-xen-dir; \ > > > > + if $$source/scripts/tracetool.py --check-backends -- > > > > backends > > > > log ; then \ > > > > > > --check-backends only works on qemu-xen >= 4.6, on the other hand we > > > know that qemu-xen < 4.6 supports stderr. > > > > But, if you use '--check-backend --backend' (no 's') instead, the check > > would works with qemu-xen >= 4.3 > > That would be preferable to the below, IMHO. Any contrary opinions? Actually, given that the upstream default is now "log", how about: Â Â Â Â if $$source/scripts/tracetool.py --check-backend --backend stderr ; then \ enable_trace_backend='--enable-trace-backend=stderr'; \ else \ enable_trace_backend='' ; \ Â Â Â Â fi ; \ IOW just accept the upstream default (be it log or whatever comes next) from this version onwards? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |