[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/7] xen/vm-events: Move monitor_domctl to common-side.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Corneliu ZUZU <czuzu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 1. Kconfig: So these commit messages are not very good IMHO. Rather then just summarizing what the patch does you should describe why the patch is needed in the first place. Usually for longer series having a cover page is also helpful to outline how the patches in the series fit together. Â
You mentioned in the previous revision of this series that currently you only have plans to implement write_ctrleg and guest_request events for ARM. I think singlestep and software_breakpoint should not be moved to common without a clear plan to have those implemented. Now, if you were to include the implementation of write_ctrlreg and guest_request in this series and leave the others in x86 as they are now, I don't think there would be any reason to have these Kconfig options present at all. Â +Â Â Â Âselect HAS_VM_EVENT_SINGLESTEP This function is defined to return bool_t and yet you are returning non-boolean error codes. I think it would be better if this function just had a single rc instead of two (not passing one rc as a pointer on input). Â + _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |