[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] common: re-arrange struct kernel_param fields

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:18:01 +0000
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:18:15 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On 15/02/2016 07:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Even if placed in .init.* there's no reason to needlessly bloat the
> binary due to padding fields the compiler needs to insert on 64-bit
> architectures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] common: re-arrange struct kernel_param fields
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 01/23] xen/xsplice: Hypervisor implementation of XEN_XSPLICE_op (v10)
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] common: re-arrange struct kernel_param fields
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/HVM: fold hypercall tables
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.