[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCHv2 1/3] x86/fpu: improve check for XSAVE* not writing FIP/FDP fields
>>> On 23.02.16 at 12:54, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 23/02/16 11:18, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 23/02/16 11:05, David Vrabel wrote: >>> The hardware may not write the FIP/FDP fields with a XSAVE* >>> instruction. e.g., with XSAVEOPT/XSAVES if the state hasn't changed >>> or on AMD CPUs when a floating point exception is not pending. We >>> need to identify this case so we can correctly apply the check for >>> whether to save/restore FCS/FDS. >>> >>> By toggling FIP[63] we can turn the field into a non-canonical address >>> and check for this value after the XSAVE instruction. >>> >>> This results in smaller code with fewer branches and is more >>> understandable. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> For consistently, the same change in detection logic should be applied >> to fpu_fxsave() > > I don't think it is necessary. fpu_fxsave() only needs to check for the > AMD case, and the logic is already simple. I agree. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |