[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 13/21] arm/gic-v2: Add ACPI boot support for GICv2
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: > On 2016/2/25 18:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: > >> On 2016/1/28 20:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote: > >>>> From: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> ACPI on Xen hypervisor uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. > >>>> First get the GIC version from GIC Distributor. Then parse GIC related > >>>> subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor addresses and call > >>>> driver initialization function (which is hardware abstraction agnostic). > >>>> In a similar way, FDT initialize GICv2. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> V4: use container_of and fix coding style > >>>> --- > >>>> xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 120 > >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > >>>> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > >>>> index 668b863..7e46ee9 100644 > >>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > >>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > >>>> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ > >>>> #include <xen/device_tree.h> > >>>> #include <xen/libfdt/libfdt.h> > >>>> #include <xen/sizes.h> > >>>> +#include <xen/acpi.h> > >>>> +#include <acpi/actables.h> > >>>> #include <asm/p2m.h> > >>>> #include <asm/domain.h> > >>>> #include <asm/platform.h> > >>>> @@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ > >>>> > >>>> #include <asm/io.h> > >>>> #include <asm/gic.h> > >>>> +#include <asm/acpi.h> > >>>> > >>>> /* > >>>> * LR register definitions are GIC v2 specific. > >>>> @@ -681,11 +684,111 @@ static void __init gicv2_dt_init(void) > >>>> csize, vsize); > >>>> } > >>>> > >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > >>>> +static int __init > >>>> +gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > >>>> + const unsigned long end) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + static int cpu_base_assigned = 0; > >>>> + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor = > >>>> + container_of(header, struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt, > >>>> header); > >>>> + > >>>> + if ( BAD_MADT_ENTRY(processor, end) ) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Read from APIC table and fill up the GIC variables */ > >>>> + if ( cpu_base_assigned == 0 ) > >>>> + { > >>>> + cbase = processor->base_address; > >>>> + csize = SZ_8K; > >>>> + hbase = processor->gich_base_address; > >>>> + vbase = processor->gicv_base_address; > >>>> + gicv2_info.maintenance_irq = processor->vgic_interrupt; > >>>> + > >>>> + if( processor->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE ) > >>> > >>> ^ if ( > >>> > >>> > >>>> + irq_set_type(gicv2_info.maintenance_irq, > >>>> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH); > >>>> + else > >>>> + irq_set_type(gicv2_info.maintenance_irq, > >>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK); > >>>> + > >>>> + cpu_base_assigned = 1; > >>>> + } > >>>> + else > >>>> + { > >>>> + if ( cbase != processor->base_address > >>>> + || hbase != processor->gich_base_address > >>>> + || vbase != processor->gicv_base_address > >>>> + || gicv2_info.maintenance_irq != processor->vgic_interrupt > >>>> ) > >>>> + { > >>>> + printk("GICv2: GICC entries are not same in MADT table\n"); > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + } > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + return 0; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static int __init > >>>> +gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > >>>> + const unsigned long end) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist = > >>>> + container_of(header, struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor, > >>>> header); > >>>> + > >>>> + if ( BAD_MADT_ENTRY(dist, end) ) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + > >>>> + dbase = dist->base_address; > >>>> + > >>>> + return 0; > >>>> +} > >>>> + > >>>> +static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + acpi_status status; > >>>> + struct acpi_table_header *table; > >>>> + int count; > >>>> + > >>>> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_MADT, 0, &table); > >>>> + > >>>> + if ( ACPI_FAILURE(status) ) > >>>> + { > >>>> + const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status); > >>>> + > >>>> + panic("GICv2: Failed to get MADT table, %s", msg); > >>>> + } > >>>> + > >>>> + /* Collect CPU base addresses */ > >>>> + count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT, sizeof(struct > >>>> acpi_table_madt), > >>>> + gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu, table, > >>>> + ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, 0); > >>>> + if ( count <= 0 ) > >>>> + panic("GICv2: No valid GICC entries exists"); > >>>> + > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * Find distributor base address. We expect one distributor entry > >>>> since > >>>> + * ACPI 5.0 spec neither support multi-GIC instances nor GIC > >>>> cascade. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT, sizeof(struct > >>>> acpi_table_madt), > >>>> + gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor, table, > >>>> + ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_DISTRIBUTOR, 0); > >>>> + if ( count <= 0 ) > >>>> + panic("GICv2: No valid GICD entries exists"); > >>>> +} > >>>> +#else > >>>> +static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void) > >>>> +{ > >>>> +/* Should never reach here */ > >>>> +} > >>>> +#endif > >>> > >>> With acpi_disabled becoming an #define constant, this #else should not > >>> be needed. > >>> > >> If I remove #else and define acpi_disabled as a constant as you > >> suggested, it has below compiling error on arm32. > >> > >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > >> index 9a9fcd5..28ec064 100644 > >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > >> @@ -776,11 +776,6 @@ static void __init acpi_gicv2_init(void) > >> if ( count <= 0 ) > >> panic("GICv2: No valid GICD entries exists"); > >> } > >> -#else > >> -static void __init acpi_gicv2_init(void) > >> -{ > >> -/* Should never reach here */ > >> -} > >> #endif > >> > >> gic-v2.c: In function 'gicv2_init': > >> gic-v2.c:793:9: error: implicit declaration of function > >> 'acpi_gicv2_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > >> gic-v2.c:793:9: error: nested extern declaration of 'acpi_gicv2_init' > >> [-Werror=nested-externs] > >> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > > > Sorry, I should have been clearer. You still need to have a declaration > > of the function outside the #ifdef. Something like the following should > > work: > > > > static void acpi_gicv2_init(void); > > > > [...] > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > > static void __init acpi_gicv2_init(void) > > { > > /* do something */ > > } > > #endif > > > > [...] > > > > if ( acpi_disabled ) > > gicv2_dt_init(); > > else > > gicv2_acpi_init(); > > > > . > > > I'm afraid it doesn't work. Still has below errors with the declaration: > > gic-v2.c:687:13: error: 'gicv2_acpi_init' used but never defined [-Werror] > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > index 4b6c4c0..7b7e094 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c > @@ -684,6 +684,8 @@ static void __init gicv2_dt_init(void) > csize, vsize); > } > > +static void gicv2_acpi_init(void); It should be void gicv2_acpi_init(void); without "static". > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > static int __init > gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header, > @@ -774,11 +776,6 @@ static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void) > if ( count <= 0 ) > panic("GICv2: No valid GICD entries exists"); > } > -#else > -static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void) > -{ > -/* Should never reach here */ > -} > #endif > > static int __init gicv2_init(void) > > -- > Shannon > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |