|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 13/21] arm/gic-v2: Add ACPI boot support for GICv2
On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> On 2016/2/25 18:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >> On 2016/1/28 20:56, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 23 Jan 2016, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> >>>> From: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> ACPI on Xen hypervisor uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization.
> >>>> First get the GIC version from GIC Distributor. Then parse GIC related
> >>>> subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor addresses and call
> >>>> driver initialization function (which is hardware abstraction agnostic).
> >>>> In a similar way, FDT initialize GICv2.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit <parth.dixit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> V4: use container_of and fix coding style
> >>>> ---
> >>>> xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c | 120
> >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 119 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> >>>> index 668b863..7e46ee9 100644
> >>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> >>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> >>>> @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@
> >>>> #include <xen/device_tree.h>
> >>>> #include <xen/libfdt/libfdt.h>
> >>>> #include <xen/sizes.h>
> >>>> +#include <xen/acpi.h>
> >>>> +#include <acpi/actables.h>
> >>>> #include <asm/p2m.h>
> >>>> #include <asm/domain.h>
> >>>> #include <asm/platform.h>
> >>>> @@ -36,6 +38,7 @@
> >>>>
> >>>> #include <asm/io.h>
> >>>> #include <asm/gic.h>
> >>>> +#include <asm/acpi.h>
> >>>>
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * LR register definitions are GIC v2 specific.
> >>>> @@ -681,11 +684,111 @@ static void __init gicv2_dt_init(void)
> >>>> csize, vsize);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> >>>> +static int __init
> >>>> +gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> >>>> + const unsigned long end)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + static int cpu_base_assigned = 0;
> >>>> + struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor =
> >>>> + container_of(header, struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt,
> >>>> header);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if ( BAD_MADT_ENTRY(processor, end) )
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Read from APIC table and fill up the GIC variables */
> >>>> + if ( cpu_base_assigned == 0 )
> >>>> + {
> >>>> + cbase = processor->base_address;
> >>>> + csize = SZ_8K;
> >>>> + hbase = processor->gich_base_address;
> >>>> + vbase = processor->gicv_base_address;
> >>>> + gicv2_info.maintenance_irq = processor->vgic_interrupt;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if( processor->flags & ACPI_MADT_VGIC_IRQ_MODE )
> >>>
> >>> ^ if (
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> + irq_set_type(gicv2_info.maintenance_irq,
> >>>> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH);
> >>>> + else
> >>>> + irq_set_type(gicv2_info.maintenance_irq,
> >>>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + cpu_base_assigned = 1;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + else
> >>>> + {
> >>>> + if ( cbase != processor->base_address
> >>>> + || hbase != processor->gich_base_address
> >>>> + || vbase != processor->gicv_base_address
> >>>> + || gicv2_info.maintenance_irq != processor->vgic_interrupt
> >>>> )
> >>>> + {
> >>>> + printk("GICv2: GICC entries are not same in MADT table\n");
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int __init
> >>>> +gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> >>>> + const unsigned long end)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist =
> >>>> + container_of(header, struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor,
> >>>> header);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if ( BAD_MADT_ENTRY(dist, end) )
> >>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + dbase = dist->base_address;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + acpi_status status;
> >>>> + struct acpi_table_header *table;
> >>>> + int count;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_MADT, 0, &table);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + if ( ACPI_FAILURE(status) )
> >>>> + {
> >>>> + const char *msg = acpi_format_exception(status);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + panic("GICv2: Failed to get MADT table, %s", msg);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* Collect CPU base addresses */
> >>>> + count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT, sizeof(struct
> >>>> acpi_table_madt),
> >>>> + gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu, table,
> >>>> + ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT, 0);
> >>>> + if ( count <= 0 )
> >>>> + panic("GICv2: No valid GICC entries exists");
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /*
> >>>> + * Find distributor base address. We expect one distributor entry
> >>>> since
> >>>> + * ACPI 5.0 spec neither support multi-GIC instances nor GIC
> >>>> cascade.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> + count = acpi_parse_entries(ACPI_SIG_MADT, sizeof(struct
> >>>> acpi_table_madt),
> >>>> + gic_acpi_parse_madt_distributor, table,
> >>>> + ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_DISTRIBUTOR, 0);
> >>>> + if ( count <= 0 )
> >>>> + panic("GICv2: No valid GICD entries exists");
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +#else
> >>>> +static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +/* Should never reach here */
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> With acpi_disabled becoming an #define constant, this #else should not
> >>> be needed.
> >>>
> >> If I remove #else and define acpi_disabled as a constant as you
> >> suggested, it has below compiling error on arm32.
> >>
> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> >> index 9a9fcd5..28ec064 100644
> >> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> >> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> >> @@ -776,11 +776,6 @@ static void __init acpi_gicv2_init(void)
> >> if ( count <= 0 )
> >> panic("GICv2: No valid GICD entries exists");
> >> }
> >> -#else
> >> -static void __init acpi_gicv2_init(void)
> >> -{
> >> -/* Should never reach here */
> >> -}
> >> #endif
> >>
> >> gic-v2.c: In function 'gicv2_init':
> >> gic-v2.c:793:9: error: implicit declaration of function
> >> 'acpi_gicv2_init' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >> gic-v2.c:793:9: error: nested extern declaration of 'acpi_gicv2_init'
> >> [-Werror=nested-externs]
> >> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> >
> > Sorry, I should have been clearer. You still need to have a declaration
> > of the function outside the #ifdef. Something like the following should
> > work:
> >
> > static void acpi_gicv2_init(void);
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > static void __init acpi_gicv2_init(void)
> > {
> > /* do something */
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > if ( acpi_disabled )
> > gicv2_dt_init();
> > else
> > gicv2_acpi_init();
> >
> > .
> >
> I'm afraid it doesn't work. Still has below errors with the declaration:
>
> gic-v2.c:687:13: error: 'gicv2_acpi_init' used but never defined [-Werror]
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> index 4b6c4c0..7b7e094 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/gic-v2.c
> @@ -684,6 +684,8 @@ static void __init gicv2_dt_init(void)
> csize, vsize);
> }
>
> +static void gicv2_acpi_init(void);
It should be
void gicv2_acpi_init(void);
without "static".
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> static int __init
> gic_acpi_parse_madt_cpu(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
> @@ -774,11 +776,6 @@ static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void)
> if ( count <= 0 )
> panic("GICv2: No valid GICD entries exists");
> }
> -#else
> -static void __init gicv2_acpi_init(void)
> -{
> -/* Should never reach here */
> -}
> #endif
>
> static int __init gicv2_init(void)
>
> --
> Shannon
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |