[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/11] Return failure on failure for more xl commands
I will resend them as soon as I managed to check it all once again. At 22 April the decision of selected candidates is going to be posted. During that time I should complete the bite-size task and according to the https://wiki.gnome.org/Outreachy work on more contributions if that is possible. Paulina On 31 March 2016 at 17:06, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:19:41PM +0200, Paulina Szubarczyk wrote: >> Yes, I was looking at wrong branch, I am sorry. The patches >> >> * {01-04,08,11} were not attached in the previous patch [0]. >> >> * {05,06} are applied in the version made by George Dunlap. >> I added the changes to return 0/1 in internal functions >> and EXIT_{SUCCESS/FAILURE} according to [2]. It certainly should be >> resend. >> >> * 07 was attached in the previous patch but is not applied in staging. >> It relates pci-* functions. I modified it as in the point higher. >> >> * 09 is applied. >> >> * 10 is not applied, I did not modified it. It brings coding style >> improvements. >> > > Given that the applied patches interleave with not-yet-applied patches I > think it's best if you can rebase on top of staging and resend. > > We shall look at it in due time. Note that we're currently quite busy so > it might take us some time to get to your patches. Do you have a > deadline that you need to meet? Deadline for OPW etc? > > Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |