Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 91226: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dario Faggioli writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 91226: regressions 
- FAIL"):
> This is merlot again! :-/
> 
> As said to Wei on IRC, I can try to look into this (i.e., the issues
> with merlot in general), but only next week, after the hackathon.

For now, I think we have concluded that there is no evidence that this
is actually a regression in 4.7 compared to earlier versions of Xen.
It is not clear whether it's a bug which happens to be host-specific,
or an actual bug in the host.

Thanks for offering to investigate.

In the meantime I am going to unbless their equiv-* so that they won't
be used for these pair tests.  If after this we see further problems,
we can consider stronger measures.

Thanks,
Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel