Re: [Xen-devel] linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the arm64 tree

[Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:00:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   3194ac6e66cc ("arm64: Move unflatten_device_tree() call earlier.")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   3915fea959b6 ("ARM: XEN: Move xen_early_init() before efi_init()")
> 
> from the xen-tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks Stephen, looks good to me.

Will

> diff --cc arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> index 65f515949baa,7cf992fe6684..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
> @@@ -277,13 -336,13 +278,11 @@@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p
>   
>       early_ioremap_reset();
>   
>  -    if (acpi_disabled) {
>  -            unflatten_device_tree();
>  +    if (acpi_disabled)
>               psci_dt_init();
>  -    } else {
>  +    else
>               psci_acpi_init();
>  -    }
>   
> -     xen_early_init();
> - 
>       cpu_read_bootcpu_ops();
>       smp_init_cpus();
>       smp_build_mpidr_hash();
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel