[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Questions about the new usb hotplug code in libxl and about adding hotplug (with qmp) usbredir tcp channels
Il 27/04/2016 13:26, George Dunlap ha scritto: On 27/04/16 12:02, Fabio Fantoni wrote:Hi, I took a look at the new pvusb hotplug code in libxl to try to add also hotplug (with qmp) usbredir tcp channels. Adding usbredir tcp channels at domU start requires for example adding qemu parameters like these: "-chardev socket,id=charredir4,host=192.168.1.35,port=40000 -device usb-redir,chardev=charredir4,id=redir4". It is possible to hotplug it with qmp using "chardev-add" and "device_add" commands. Looking at old George Dunlap's patches I tested years ago (http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/gdunlap/xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=f7a77843e3fcf070c72115be8ed349a3bfe34e60) I can understand what they do and I can add similar qmp functions for usbredir tcp too. But now I see that bigger and different usb hotplug code was added, I looked at these patches: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=bf7628f087b212052a0e9f024044b2790c33f820 http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=043910384cb9ea2c781a7dceac238e110a559c10 and the full current code in xen's staging branch but I didn't find qmp commands for the qemu usb passthrough, I suppose it is missing or incomplete (though strange), am I wrong? If that is correct, pvusb drivers are needed for both host and domU to have usb passthrough working but in new windows pv drivers, the pvusb one is missing, so without the "qemu emulated" usb passthrough it doesn't work at all in similar cases, right?That's right -- the PVUSB code *only* does PVUSB passthrough. The interface was designed, however, to be able to add emulated USB on top.How do you think I should proceed to implement hotplug usbredir tcp channels in libxl?So I'm not familiar with usbredir tcp channels. I'm guessing that it allows you to transmit the USB commands "over the wire", so that you could connect (say) a keyboard or printer on your local computer to the qemu process running in a remote dom0, and have the USB device presented as an emulated device to the guest? Yes.In qemu upstream there are 2 methods of usbredir use, one is "dynamic" using spice. I made a quick and easy implementation in libxl some time ago at domU's create: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=f5414ee57a17500e650ea11766474b11da940da2this also requires an emulated usb<1|2|3> controller, which I added with this: http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commitdiff;h=bba6747189fb9c4cb51f3c99977d224615106c59It works fine with both windows and linux domUs and I already use it in production but it works ONLY using spice. I want to add the other method to make passthrough of client usb devices possible without spice too. Adding it at domU's create is quick and easy, I could do something like the first patch posted above which use the usb controller provided by the other patch but unfortunately the addition of usbredir tcp channels is not "dynamic" as with spice, but it needs a specific target (ip and port) running usbredirserver, so usbredir tcp will be nearly always used "hotplug" with the domU running. Hotplug can be done with qmp using "chardev-add" and "device_add" commands, and similar commands for remove. Keeping track of current usbredir channels can be done with the xenstore, like pvusb does, I suppose. I think that making it hotplug should be done with care and if possible without making it incompatible with others usb passthrough methods. So I wonder how it should be done in practice. Here I don't understand exactly what you mean, usbredir tcp channels are created by upstream qemu and use an emulated usb controller that should be already present or added before. I don't know how to use a pvusb instead and I suppose it will require specific changes to be done in qemu.If so, then: 1. It may be possible using Juergen's qusb work to act as a usbredir tcp channel <-> pvusb bridge 2. But having the devices presented to Windows guests without pvusbfront drivers would depend on having emulated USB working first. The current pvusb code added recently is more bigger/complex and I have difficulties to understand it by following all the relevant code paths. I'm trying to understand if a usbredir tcp channels hotplug implementation can be based on it. I suppose it will be possible after adding the full emulated usb passthrough case.I'm working up a draft implementation of the emulated USB just so I can make sure the current interface is suitable to extend it before it becomes public (and thus needs to be supported). Any advice is appreciated. I'm not sure how the usbredir tcp channel interacts with emulated controllers; that's what will determine what the libxl interface will look like. Peace, -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |