Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/shadow: account for ioreq server pages before complaining about not found mapping

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 29/04/16 18:10, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 06:39 -0600 on 29 Apr (1461911995), Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 29.04.16 at 14:28, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> It would be nice if we could use gfn_t rather than having more unsigned
>>> longs.
>> I generally agree, but intentionally didn't to match all the other
>> shadow code. I'll make changing this dependent on what Tim
>> thinks.
> Is gfn_t even available here?

Yes.  It is available everywhere since c/s 177bd5fb "mem: expose
typesafe mfns/gfns/pfns to common code"  (I wonder who acked a patch
like that ;p)

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel