[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 07/10] IOMMU: propagate IOMMU Device-TLB flush error up to iommu_iotlb_flush{, _all} (leaf ones).
On May 11, 2016 3:06 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On 11.05.16 at 08:47, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On May 10, 2016 5:07 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >>> On 06.05.16 at 10:54, <quan.xu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > >> > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/iommu.c > >> > @@ -604,15 +604,15 @@ static int iommu_flush_iotlb(struct domain > >> > *d, > >> unsigned long gfn, > >> > return rc; > >> > } > >> > > >> > -static void iommu_flush_iotlb_page(struct domain *d, unsigned long > gfn, > >> > - unsigned int page_count) > >> > +static int iommu_flush_iotlb_page(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn, > >> > + unsigned int page_count) > >> > { > >> > - iommu_flush_iotlb(d, gfn, 1, page_count); > >> > + return iommu_flush_iotlb(d, gfn, 1, page_count); > >> > } > >> > > >> > -static void iommu_flush_iotlb_all(struct domain *d) > >> > +static int iommu_flush_iotlb_all(struct domain *d) > >> > { > >> > - iommu_flush_iotlb(d, INVALID_GFN, 0, 0); > >> > + return iommu_flush_iotlb(d, INVALID_GFN, 0, 0); > >> > } > >> > >> As already indicated in a reply to an earlier patch, despite what was > >> said on the earlier version I think we should have __must_check here > > > > If the static one is initialized for .callback, is it really necessary > > to add __must_check here? > > I check it with compiler, and it is ok when I didn't add __must_check here. > > Without you telling us what exactly you checked, I can't respond to this. > Extending from the reply just sent to patch 3(?) and for the avoidance of > doubt, you now obviously also need to __must_check-annotate the function > pointer (to match the desire of wanting to never lose such an annotation on > the way back up the call tree). > I checked -- without __must_check for iommu_flush_iotlb_page() / iommu_flush_iotlb_all(). > > If yes, I'll add __must_check for ARM one as well. > > Of course. > Got it. Quan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |