|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/vm_event: Add HVM debug exception vm_events
>>> On 23.06.16 at 19:07, <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -3373,10 +3373,39 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
> HVMTRACE_1D(TRAP_DEBUG, exit_qualification);
> write_debugreg(6, exit_qualification | DR_STATUS_RESERVED_ONE);
> if ( !v->domain->debugger_attached )
> - vmx_propagate_intr(intr_info);
> + {
> + unsigned long insn_len = 0;
> + int rc;
> + unsigned long trap_type = MASK_EXTR(intr_info,
> +
> INTR_INFO_INTR_TYPE_MASK);
> +
> + if ( trap_type >= X86_EVENTTYPE_SW_INTERRUPT )
> + __vmread(VM_EXIT_INSTRUCTION_LEN, &insn_len);
> +
> + rc = hvm_monitor_debug(regs->eip,
> + HVM_MONITOR_DEBUG_EXCEPTION,
> + trap_type, insn_len);
> +
> + /*
> + * !rc continue normally
> + * rc > paused waiting for response, work here is done
> + * rc < error, fall-through to exit_and_crash
> + */
> + if ( !rc )
> + {
> + vmx_propagate_intr(intr_info);
> + break;
> + }
> + if ( rc > 0 )
> + break;
> + }
> else
> + {
> domain_pause_for_debugger();
> - break;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + goto exit_and_crash;
I continue to think this is sub-optimal structuring (at once needlessly
making the patch larger), but it'll be the VMX maintainers to judge.
For the few pieces it is relevant for:
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |