[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] tools/libxc, xen/x86: Added xc_set_mem_access_multi()
- To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:51:33 +0100
- Cc: sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx, Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jbeulich@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 11:51:44 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
George Dunlap writes ("Re: [PATCH V3] tools/libxc, xen/x86: Added
xc_set_mem_access_multi()"):
> So you really don't mind if Razvan submits a patch for code that he
> hasn't tested and isn't sure works?
I don't think that's a very good idea. (Are there possible security
implications? It's not entirely clear to me...)
Under the circumstances I don't think it's reasonable to expect Razvan
to write the patch, unless some ARM maintainer is willing to test it.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
