Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 100789: regressions - FAIL

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 08/09/16 10:43, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 05:32:00AM +0000, osstest service owner wrote:
>> flight 100789 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/100789/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd  9 debian-di-install        fail REGR. vs. 
>> 100773
> [...]
>>  test-armhf-armhf-xl-vhd       9 debian-di-install        fail REGR. vs. 
>> 100773
>>
> Andrew pointed out IRL that these two regressions are unfortunate side
> effect of deleting blktap2. In short, the vhd-util used in these tests
> comes from Xen's blktap2. :-/
>
> I see three ways to move this forward.
>
> 1. Resurrect vhd-util from blktap2.
> 2. Install blktap-utils shipped in Debian (available from Wheezy
>    onwards), the main difficulty would be the package depends on a dkms
>    package that seems to require building with kernel header when
>    installing.
> 3. Retire these two tests.
>
> In the meantime, if we want to avoid blocking xen-unstable for too long,
> we might want to force push.

+1 to a force push for now.  There are quite a few changes currently
blocked.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel